![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Home :: Forums :: Manufacturers :: Articles :: About Us :: Vendors :: Analysis Reports |
|
Forum | Register | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Calendar | Auto Loans | Mark Forums Read | Advertise | Auto Escrow | Insurance |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 | |||
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 176
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement
|
|
![]() |
#32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 101
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Hudson |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 89
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
#34 |
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 507
|
![]()
Not to argue with anyone, but can someone cite the source on the 25% US tariff on imported trucks? I swear I read it somewhere and it only applies to single cab trucks.
So Range Rovers, Toyota Landcruisers, Porsche, and any other imports EPA or the gov label as "trucks" get this tariff? How does it work? I'd really like to know. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 101
|
![]()
Range Rovers, Land Cruisers, and Cayennes are SUVs. Being four-door SUVs, they side-step the law. There was a time when regulators made a differentiation between a 2-door SUV and a 4-door SUV where the 2-door models were trucks and the 4-door models were "passenger cars," but Nissan sued and won making all SUVs "passenger cars" under the law.
Pickups of all bodystyles (as long as they have an open bed) are "trucks" and fall under the "chicken tax." I'm not sure how the law treats vans (specifically Kia, Hyundai, and Mazda minivans) since it was originally established to punish Germany who was exporting Volkswagen vans to the US.
__________________
Hudson |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 507
|
![]()
So anything with an "open" bed? How about a truck with a removable "camper"? A lot of folks add them to their trucks to enclose the bed, after market parts of course.
Maybe making the removable "camper" standard? ![]() Sounds like a pretty easy law to "bypass". The law is probably against WTO regulations, but no one has yet to complain ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 101
|
![]()
The actual regulation may not say "bed" but may refer to an opening from the passenger area to the cargo compartment. If you made a Bronco/4Runner-like vehicle, that would be an SUV. I do recall Subaru creating the BRAT with the jump seats in the bed to make it a passenger car and not a truck, therefore evading the tariff.
The "chicken tax" only applies to countries that the US does not have trade agreements with. If you were to build a truck in countries like Chile or Israel or the Dominican Republic, your vehicle would be exempt. Australia and Thailand have been working on similar agreements (the former may already exist).
__________________
Hudson |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: US of A
Posts: 263
|
![]()
when do you think that they'll go to the US?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 314
|
![]() Quote:
what if the chinese cars takes years to certify (if ever ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
|
![]()
why does china feel the need to make a land cruiser clone,built your own rig,are they kidding
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|