actually this is the same logic analyst use to prove that india is better off economically than china in the long termrenyeo said:There are no short cuts! Chery is trying to leapfrog what is essentially a time-based process. Going too far too quick invites trouble. SAIC's a better bet.
well jsut in case you dont know, china really sucks in everything fifty years ago, getting invaded, no technology of any sort, cutting pieces of land to other counties, cant defend any attacts, almost every stong country is picking on them. How about today? Hong Kong is back, Macau is back, nuclear weapons, homemade fighter jets, home made tanks, home made satilights, home made space rockets that actually works and brings man to space, having famous MADE IN CHINA trademark on everything, buying off MG rover, buying IBM's pc line, nearly buying Maytag (didnt get it even though the offered a higher price), providing 80% of stock to walmart, making nike shoes, addidas, puma, doing awsome in olympics, first public operation magnetic trains, pearl tower, beijing 2008 ... and im getting tired of typing oh yea btw this all happened in the last 50 years and the chances of it stopping is near 0renyeo said:There are no short cuts! Chery is trying to leapfrog what is essentially a time-based process. Going too far too quick invites trouble. SAIC's a better bet.
Btw, what makes Geely a Honda? Just curious...
for some reason i keep thinking chery the next toyota and geely the next honda, and zhonghua the next lexus or something.ash said:i meant in the context, IN 20 years, geely might be in the position of Honda (financially and popularity wise)
but lately ive been thinking otherwise of geely, i should make it CHERY, the next honda