China Car Forums banner
1 - 4 of 4 Posts

· Registered
773 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·

Chinese Cars At Show Look Good, But Are Still Not Ready For The U.S.

By The Post, Tierney

Published on 12/2/2006 in Wheels » Wheels National

AA stroll through Hall 1 of the Beijing auto show confirms what industry experts say about China's carmakers: Some are making impressive strides in the design and finish of their newest models, but they're not quite ready to compete in the U.S. and European markets.
China's automakers seem to have come to the same realization and the most intrepid are quietly scaling back their plans.

Geely Automobile Co., a private Chinese carmaker, recently delayed plans to export cars to the United States and now doesn't expect to start before 2009.

Chery Automobile Co. originally set out to export cars to the United States in a venture with entrepreneur Malcolm Bricklin but is now negotiating deals with blue-chip automakers. It has signed a deal to supply small engines to Italy's Fiat Auto. Chery also is in talks with DaimlerChrysler AG about building a small car for the Chrysler Group.

China's largest carmakers were cautious from the outset. Shanghai-based SAIC Motor Corp., China's largest passenger carmaker through its joint ventures

with General Motors Corp. and Volkswagen AG, has begun producing its own-brand car, the Rover-based Roewe 750. For now, it's focusing on its domestic market and hasn't laid out an export strategy.

However, SAIC is laying the groundwork to become a serious global competitor.

It became the first Chinese automaker to buy a foreign car company when it acquired a controlling stake in South Korea's Ssangyong Motor last year. Although Ssangyong was a troubled company and a minor player in the Korean market dominated by Hyundai Motor Co., its lineup of sport utility vehicles complemented SAIC's growing expertise in the car business. Ssangyong also has a big export network, selling vehicles in many countries, including Britain and Germany.

In June, SAIC hired the former chairman of General Motors China Group, Phil Murtaugh, to manage its overseas activities. Murtaugh is widely credited for helping to transform GM China into a leading player in the Chinese market by forging good relations with its venture partners and reading market trends correctly.

Now executive vice president of SAIC, Murtaugh spends most of his time working on Ssangyong to develop new products and sales channels. “This year will be a struggle, but I feel good about Ssangyong's prospects because of the advantage of the synergies with SAIC,” he said .

SAIC and Ssangyong have already begun to develop vehicle platforms which they'll use jointly, with the first models built on those underbodies expected to appear within four years.

The two automakers also will pool their components purchases, and SAIC will have access to Ssangyong's export network. “The benefits go both ways, both to SAIC and to Ssangyong, in all three areas,” Murtaugh said.

For now, SAIC isn't rushing to export vehicles.

“We have plans to export, but that's not a priority today,” he said. “We don't feel it makes sense for us to start exploring other international markets when we have the hottest market here that we know the best.

But if that market starts to cool, SAIC will be ready to look elsewhere.

· Registered
280 Posts
I don't see anything negative about that article.

It says that China's cars are not yet ready, but they are advancing rapidly and soon will compete with the best. That's GOOD NEWS. I'd rather China wait a couple more years and export quality cars here than be like Hyundai and export garbage on wheels, then take twenty years to recover your reputation.

· Registered
450 Posts
It's a really positive article. Nowadays hater knows that most people don't bother to read his posts, so he just puts up an emotive title and pastes a load of text in below it in the hope that people will think 'oh yeah these cars are all crap never buy one'.

i think he's getting a bit tired.
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.